Skip to main contentEnter
Ipswich.co.uk Logomark in a circle

Ipswich's only independent news website

We publish the stories that matter and champion everything that's good about our town – without the ads, popups or tracking

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

We can't do this without you!

If you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for our town, please consider contributing just £24 per year

'Power grab' accusations fly as Suffolk councils battle over devolution plans

News
Ipswich.co.uk Logomark in a circle

Ipswich's only independent news website

We publish the stories that matter and champion everything that's good about our town – without the ads, popups or tracking

Suffolk County Council has refused to debate a three-council proposal, as council leaders exchange barbs over the future shape of local government in Suffolk.

Why it matters: The government's English Devolution White Paper presents what Ipswich Borough Council leader Neil MacDonald calls a "once-in-a-generation opportunity" to reshape local governance in Suffolk, with rival models vying for approval.

The big picture: Suffolk County Council supports creating a single unitary authority covering the entire county, while Ipswich Borough Council unanimously backs a three-council approach based around Ipswich, Lowestoft and Bury St Edmunds.

State of play: Suffolk County Council on 13 March ruled an amendment from Labour councillors seeking a three-unitary model as "out of order," preventing debate on alternatives to the single-council proposal.

  • Suffolk's Labour County Councillors argue that Suffolk residents identify with one of three major settlements for their public services, commercial hubs, and centres of leisure and social activity.

  • Councillor Sandy Martin, Leader of the Labour Group, said: "There are differences of opinion about whether there should be one single unitary council or three, but to refuse to have a proper debate about it shows the Conservatives' contempt for the views of others."

The opposition view: The Green, Liberal Democrat and Independent group at Suffolk County Council has also criticised the single-council approach.

  • Councillor Andrew Stringer, the group's leader, said: "The administration are hoping that the creation of a single unitary council will provide a lifeboat for council finance in Suffolk – but this is not a given."

  • "We will fight for keeping the 'local' in local democracy every step of the way," he added.

On the other side: Suffolk County Council's motion argued that a single unitary authority would deliver the best outcomes and greatest financial savings, claiming that splitting social care services between multiple councils could worsen outcomes for vulnerable residents.

Meanwhile in Ipswich: Borough councillors met on Wednesday, 19 March and unanimously reinforced their earlier decision to promote a three-unitary model.

  • The council emphasised Ipswich's historic and economic importance, noting the town's 825th anniversary of receiving its Charter from King John.

  • Neil MacDonald said: "The current system is fragmented and does not serve the town's needs. By unanimously supporting this interim plan, we are reinforcing our case for a governance model that gives Ipswich the leadership, investment, and representation it deserves."

What's next: Councils must submit their interim plans to central government by 21 March, with further engagement with residents, businesses, and community stakeholders in the coming months leading to final submissions in September.

The bottom line: The battle over Suffolk's governance reflects deeper tensions between centralised efficiency and local representation, with the government set to make the final decision on which model will prevail.

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

We can't do this without you!

If you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for our town, please consider contributing just £24 per year

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

Ipswich's only free and independent news publication

Support our journalism

We can't do this without you! Unlike the Ipswich Star and East Anglian Daily Times, Ipswich.co.uk has no banner advertising and no wealthy US corporate owners.

So, if you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for a better Ipswich, please consider contributing just £24 per year.

Every penny matters and allows us to keep producing good quality local journalism that respects your time, attention and privacy.

Become a supporter

Are organised crime fronts hiding in plain sight on Ipswich high streets?

Feature
Ipswich.co.uk Logomark in a circle

Ipswich's only independent news website

We publish the stories that matter and champion everything that's good about our town – without the ads, popups or tracking

The National Crime Agency's crackdown on high street businesses suspected of links to organised crime has made headlines in Shrewsbury but remains conspicuously absent in Ipswich, despite remarkably similar retail patterns.

A pattern emerging elsewhere

While Ipswich residents have yet to witness raids on local businesses, a stark scene is unfolding elsewhere: officers forcing their way into brightly-coloured barber shops, vape stores, minimarts, candy stores and phone repair shops that have proliferated across town centres.

Last month, the National Crime Agency (NCA) coordinated 265 raids on such premises across England and Wales as part of Operation Machinize, targeting high street businesses suspected of being fronts for international crime gangs – but it remains unclear if Suffolk, or Ipswich, has been part of this operation.

Organised crime and the impact on Ipswich's high street
Oliver Rouane-WilliamsIpswich.co.uk

Shrewsbury and Ipswich: towns with similar profiles

In Shrewsbury, a market town not dissimilar to Ipswich, officers detained two Kurdish asylum seekers during raids on barber shops, seizing thousands of pounds in cash and illicit vapes. The intelligence suggested these establishments were linked to money laundering, illegal immigration and drug dealing.

The parallels between Shrewsbury and Ipswich are difficult to ignore. Both are historic county towns with traditional market squares, and a mix of independent and chain retailers. Both have experienced the same influx of barber shops, vape stores, minimarts, candy stores and phone repair shops on their high street.

Yet while Shrewsbury has seen decisive action, Ipswich residents have yet to witness any comparable enforcement activity. At least not visibly. And if it has, it has yet to make any difference.

The Ipswich landscape

According to commercial property analysts Green Street, the average number of barbers per person in England and Wales has doubled in the past decade.

Walk through Ipswich town centre and the changing retail landscape is evident – multiple barber shops, vape outlets, phone repair shops and sweet shops often within yards of each other, typically with very few visible customers.

It is important to note that we are not suggesting any specific businesses in Ipswich are engaged in illegal activity. The presence of these shops alone does not indicate wrongdoing, and many could be legitimate businesses.

But questions should be asked. And questions are being asked – repeatedly – by residents.

The scale of the problem

The National Crime Agency estimates that £12 billion in illicit cash is laundered in the UK annually, with lots of it flowing through criminal front organisations on high streets.

These businesses appeared to surge as shop vacancies grew following the pandemic, creating opportunities for criminal gangs to establish themselves in plain sight.

The suspicious signs are easy to spot: businesses claiming implausible income levels, unpaid utility bills despite supposed high turnover, and the sale of illicit products like illegal vapes and tobacco.

In Greater Manchester, linked mini-marts were found to be staffed by asylum seekers, some working illegally, with hidden compartments concealing contraband.

What Operation Machinize uncovered

During Operation Machinize, authorities discovered cannabis farms, seized Class A drugs, arrested 35 people and questioned 55 suspected illegal immigrants. Three potential victims of modern slavery were identified. Bank accounts worth over £1 million were frozen and £40,000 in cash seized.

Detective Inspector Daniel Fenn, who led raids in Shrewsbury as part of the operation, said: "Members of the public are angry. They can see these fronts are there. The criminals feel they are hidden here. They think they can come to sleepy areas and won't be found."

The same could easily be said of Ipswich.

The pattern of exploitation is particularly concerning – the NCA believes some shops are used as fronts for drug-trafficking, people-smuggling, modern slavery and child sexual exploitation. In 2023, it secured the conviction of one Iranian Kurdish barber shop owner who was using his London premises as a base for smuggling 10,000 people to the UK in small boats.

Impact on legitimate businesses

Legitimate barbers are calling for a registration scheme and stricter regulation. Gareth Penn, chief executive of the Hair and Barber Council, highlighted how illegal barbers have led to fungal infections from improperly cleaned equipment.

More importantly, though, is the damage being done to genuine businesses that cannot compete with those avoiding costs and taxes, and those that cannot find suitable high street premises.

The damage is significant and potentially long-lasting.

Will Ipswich be next?

For Ipswich, the question now is whether Operation Machinize will visibly extend to Suffolk – or indeed, whether it already has without public knowledge.

Unlike local police forces, the National Crime Agency is exempt from Freedom of Information requests, making it impossible for journalists or the public to determine how many Ipswich businesses, if any, have been investigated.

This distinction is important.

While local police forces handle everyday law enforcement, the NCA was specifically created to tackle serious and organised crime that extends across police force boundaries, international borders, or requires specialist capabilities.

Their involvement signals that these high street businesses are not merely local issues but part of sophisticated criminal networks operating nationally and internationally.

Security Minister Dan Jarvis has stated that "high street crime undermines our security, our borders, and the confidence of our communities", promising "decisive action" to bring those responsible to justice.

The road ahead

There are concerns about the effectiveness of current measures. Of the 265 raids conducted, only 10 shops have been shut down permanently. Many businesses raided were back operating within minutes of officers leaving.

The challenge for authorities extends beyond individual shops to dismantling the organised crime networks behind them – networks that may have been profiting in plain sight for years on our high streets. While local police forces can target individual businesses, only the NCA has the mandate and resources to tackle the international networks behind them.

For Ipswich residents concerned about these issues, the prospect of action against suspicious businesses cannot come soon enough. However, due to the secretive nature of NCA operations, we may never know the full extent of their activities in our town – only their results, if and when they choose to make them public.

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

We can't do this without you!

If you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for our town, please consider contributing just £24 per year

Load next article