Skip to main contentEnter
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Ipswich MP backs advance rent cap limit but local property experts warn of 'unintended consequences'

News
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

Ipswich MP Jack Abbott has backed new legislation limiting advance rent payments to one month, but local property experts warn the changes could have unintended consequences for renters in Ipswich.

The big picture: The government's Renters' Rights Bill introduces a cap on advance rent payments, limiting landlords to requesting only one month's rent upfront – a significant change from the current system where multiple months can be demanded.

Lee Pearce , Head of Property Dispute Team at Ellisons , believes the legislation needs careful consideration: "For the private rental market to function effectively, it is crucial to strike a fair balance between protecting tenants and landlords. If the Government has misjudged this, their plans risk being more of a headline than a genuine solution to the challenges in the rental sector."

Why it matters: With rental properties already in short supply across Ipswich, any reduction in available housing could drive up costs and make it even harder for locals to find accommodation.

Let sign on a street
Ipswich MP Jack Abbott has backed new legislation limiting advance rent payments to one month, but local property experts warn the changes could have unintended consequences for rentersOliver Rouane-WilliamsIpswich.co.uk

By the numbers:

  • Data from the Deposit Protection Scheme shows 1 in 8 landlords requested between four and six months' rent upfront between May and December last year

  • The government estimates renters could save up to £8,000 in advance payments

The other side: Ipswich MP Jack Abbott supports the changes, saying: "For too long, renters in Ipswich have had to find large sums of cash upfront, meaning they are pushed into debt or have to go without essential living costs."

Yes, but: Pearce warns the changes could have unexpected consequences: "Reducing upfront costs will undoubtedly help renters, but deposits and advance payments are vital for landlords, providing security in a system where evictions can be lengthy and costly."

He adds that certain groups may find it harder to rent:

Opinion

Limiting upfront rent to one month's payment leaves landlords exposed and may discourage them from renting to tenants with less stable financial backgrounds. Pensioners, overseas students, the self-employed, and others may have difficulties satisfying referencing and affordability checks.

The bottom line: While the legislation aims to make renting more affordable and accessible, there are genuine concerns that it could reduce rental property availability in Ipswich and increase rental prices.

Ellisons Solicitors

Established for 260 years, Ellisons is a top 200 UK law firm and one of the region’s oldest, most established and fastest growing firms.

Ellisons' new premises at Connexions on Princes Street, Ipswich
Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

Today's supporter

Attwells Solicitors

An award-winning local law firm. Attwells is rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors and holds an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Speak with us

Multiple unitary authorities 'vital' for Suffolk's diverse communities, councils claim

News
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

A joint report from Suffolk's councils argues that the county's mix of rural, coastal, industrial, agricultural and urban areas requires more than one council to effectively serve residents.

Why it matters: The five district and borough councils say a single "mega-council" covering a vast geographical area could not focus on the competing needs of three-quarters of a million people as effectively as multiple unitary authorities.

What's driving the news: Suffolk County Council supports creating a single unitary authority covering the entire county, but this has been unanimously rejected by the five district and borough councils it would replace.

The details: Babergh District Council, East Suffolk Council, Ipswich Borough Council, Mid Suffolk District Council, and West Suffolk Council have each approved the report following a series of meetings where councillors examined and shaped the proposals.

In a joint statement, the council leaders said: "Multiple unitary authorities will produce services designed with residents in mind to meet local needs, drive improved outcomes, create value and save money in a sustainable way."

"Our joint proposal demonstrates that a one-size-fits-all mega authority will not solve the existing issue of large countywide services that will continue to drain money, require improvement, and potentially lead to further cost cutting."

By the numbers: The interim report claims multiple unitary authorities will provide:

  • Cost-effective and high-quality services for Suffolk residents

  • Long-term financial sustainability

  • Economic growth and support to local industry

  • Stronger democratic representation and community engagement

  • Governance systems which can adapt to future growth

  • Structures to support thriving communities and economies

The bigger picture: The councils argue their approach would support "a more balanced solution for the governance of the Mayoral Combined Authority" being set up next year for Norfolk and Suffolk.

What they're saying: "This is a generational change to the way local government and services are delivered and something we should seize," the council leaders stated. "It is a real opportunity to think holistically about how services such as leisure, housing and social care could help residents to thrive."

What's next: The interim report does not constitute a final decision. Councils will have further time to develop options to redesign local government, with community views "at the heart of this work."

The bottom line: "Our collective solution is the best way to deliver great services and value for money. It makes sure the 'local' stays in Local Government for Suffolk," the council leaders concluded.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Load next article