Skip to main contentEnter
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Ipswich MP Jack Abbott calls for Northern Bypass to be given national priority status

News
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

Ipswich MP Jack Abbott has written to the Prime Minister urging him to designate an Ipswich Northern Bypass as nationally significant infrastructure as the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce prepares to release damning evidence of A14 disruption's impact on the local economy.

The big picture: The timing of Abbott's letter to Sir Keir Starmer is quite deliberate. It comes just after the Government's announcement that it will accelerate major infrastructure projects across the country to support economic growth, and just before the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce releases its "Broken Down: The Economic Impact of the A14 in Suffolk" report that will provide "stark evidence" of how closures and delays affect business activity and investment.

Why it matters: Abbott warned that the Orwell Bridge's lifespan "is now envisaged to be considerably shorter than originally expected, perhaps even as short as 20 years."

Without a Northern Bypass, Ipswich faces:

  • Daily disruption costing the local economy £1 million per bridge closure

  • The risk of losing further port business to competitors like London Gateway

  • Potential economic stagnation if the Orwell Bridge reaches end of life within 20 years

  • Continued gridlock of town centre streets when incidents occur

The Orwell Bridge in Ipswich
The Orwell Bridge in IpswichRob AthertonGetty Images

What they're saying: In his letter to the Prime Minister, Abbott said: "For years, we have faced local inertia when trying to find a deliverable solution to the repeated issues regarding the Orwell Bridge and the extended A14 road network. I believe we now need Government intervention to resolve this crisis."

Abbott also criticised local decision-makers, stating: "For too long, we have been held to ransom by those who choose to pursue short-term political expediency rather than acting in the best long-term interests of our town and our county."

The Chamber's reaction: Paul Simon, Head of Public Affairs & Strategic Communications at the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce, said: "Nothing should be ruled out in seeking ways to minimise the seemingly unending disruptions on the A14" before cautioning that no single policy "will be sufficient on its own to address the daily and long-term challenges faced by businesses and residents."

He also laid out the Chamber's expectations following its report and Abbott's call for Government intervention: “What we do now expect, thanks to the very clear evidence provided by the Broken Down report, is that party political differences are put to one side. Suffolk and the country as a whole deserve and need a joined-up and pragmatic way of solving the roads crisis along the A14 corridor and across the roads network in Suffolk.”

A campaigner's view: Long-time Northern Bypass campaigner Mark Ling welcomed Abbott's intervention and agreed with the Chamber's call for a united front, calling for "unambiguous support" from key stakeholders, including:

  • The Suffolk Chamber of Commerce

  • Felixstowe Port Users' Association

  • Associated British Ports Ipswich

  • Hutchison Ports (UK) Felixstowe

  • Local authorities, including Ipswich Borough Council, East Suffolk Council, and Suffolk County Council

He also warned that planned rail improvements at Ely and Haughley junction were "nice to have" but would have limited impact compared to a Northern Bypass. He said these upgrades would only add 1,000 truck movements per day, compared to 70,000 vehicle movements daily on the Orwell Bridge, representing just 0.7% extra capacity for the A14 around Ipswich.

Ling argues that "only an [Inner] Ipswich Northern Bypass can future-proof Ipswich and Suffolk's highways needs for the next 50 years."

The bottom line: While the MP's intervention brings renewed focus to Ipswich's infrastructure challenges, any progress on a northern bypass would require significant political and financial support at both local and national levels. However, pressure is mounting for a coordinated response, which will only increase following the Suffolk of Chamber's upcoming report.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

Today's supporter

Attwells Solicitors

An award-winning local law firm. Attwells is rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors and holds an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Speak with us

Multiple unitary authorities 'vital' for Suffolk's diverse communities, councils claim

News
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

A joint report from Suffolk's councils argues that the county's mix of rural, coastal, industrial, agricultural and urban areas requires more than one council to effectively serve residents.

Why it matters: The five district and borough councils say a single "mega-council" covering a vast geographical area could not focus on the competing needs of three-quarters of a million people as effectively as multiple unitary authorities.

What's driving the news: Suffolk County Council supports creating a single unitary authority covering the entire county, but this has been unanimously rejected by the five district and borough councils it would replace.

The details: Babergh District Council, East Suffolk Council, Ipswich Borough Council, Mid Suffolk District Council, and West Suffolk Council have each approved the report following a series of meetings where councillors examined and shaped the proposals.

In a joint statement, the council leaders said: "Multiple unitary authorities will produce services designed with residents in mind to meet local needs, drive improved outcomes, create value and save money in a sustainable way."

"Our joint proposal demonstrates that a one-size-fits-all mega authority will not solve the existing issue of large countywide services that will continue to drain money, require improvement, and potentially lead to further cost cutting."

By the numbers: The interim report claims multiple unitary authorities will provide:

  • Cost-effective and high-quality services for Suffolk residents

  • Long-term financial sustainability

  • Economic growth and support to local industry

  • Stronger democratic representation and community engagement

  • Governance systems which can adapt to future growth

  • Structures to support thriving communities and economies

The bigger picture: The councils argue their approach would support "a more balanced solution for the governance of the Mayoral Combined Authority" being set up next year for Norfolk and Suffolk.

What they're saying: "This is a generational change to the way local government and services are delivered and something we should seize," the council leaders stated. "It is a real opportunity to think holistically about how services such as leisure, housing and social care could help residents to thrive."

What's next: The interim report does not constitute a final decision. Councils will have further time to develop options to redesign local government, with community views "at the heart of this work."

The bottom line: "Our collective solution is the best way to deliver great services and value for money. It makes sure the 'local' stays in Local Government for Suffolk," the council leaders concluded.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Load next article