Skip to main contentEnter

Legal challenge to Sunnica solar farm collapses as two councils withdraw

News

Suffolk County Council and East Cambridgeshire District Council have abandoned their legal challenge against the government's approval of the Sunnica solar farm project after West Suffolk Council and Cambridgeshire County Council pulled out.

The big picture: The judicial review proceedings, initially backed by four local councils, have been scrapped due to the withdrawal of West Suffolk Council and Cambridgeshire County Council, making the cost of continuing unjustifiable for the remaining two councils.

Key details:

  • The challenge aimed to secure appropriate funding for work councils would have to do as a result of the scheme.

  • The government had indicated it would defend its decision to grant permission for the Sunnica project.

  • The councils maintain that the Secretary of State made a legal error but can no longer test the case in court.

What they're saying: Councillor Richard Rout of Suffolk County Council didn't hold back:

"We are deeply disappointed by West Suffolk Council and Cambridgeshire County Council choosing not to challenge the outrageous decision by the government to approve the Sunnica solar farm that spans our two counties."

"In pulling out of this challenge, the two councils have demonstrated they are intent on serving the interests of the government over the interests of local communities and taxpayers."

Councillor Anna Bailey, Leader of East Cambridgeshire District Council, added:

"I am unbelievably disappointed with the decisions of Cambridgeshire County Council and West Suffolk Council to pull out of the Group action. They have expended public funds, the legal position has not changed, and yet they are now refusing to finish what we started. What a waste and what a let-down for local residents."

Why it matters: The collapse of the legal challenge means local taxpayers may have to foot the bill for costs related to the development, which was approved against the recommendation of the independent Planning Inspectorate.

The bottom line: While the legal challenge has ended, East Cambridgeshire District Council vows to continue working to mitigate the development's impact and secure local benefits.

Former Ipswich Town striker charged in £600k cannabis smuggling case

News

Former Ipswich Town striker Jay Emmanuel-Thomas has been charged with attempting to smuggle £600,000 worth of cannabis through a UK airport.

The big picture: The 33-year-old, who spent two seasons at Portman Road from 2011 to 2013, was arrested by National Crime Agency officers in Scotland following the seizure of approximately 60kg of the drug at Stansted airport.

Jay Emmanuel Thomas playing for Ipswich Town
Jay Emmanuel-Thomas playing for TownAlamy

Key details:

  • Jay Emmanuel-Thomas, 33, was arrested Wednesday in Gourock, Inverclyde.

  • He's accused of attempting to smuggle £600,000 worth of cannabis through Stansted airport.

  • Border Force officers found approximately 60kg of the drug in two suitcases from Bangkok.

  • Emmanuel-Thomas is set to appear at Carlisle magistrates court Thursday, charged with importing class B drugs.

60kg of cannabis
60kg of cannabis was seizedNCA

JET's Ipswich career: The journeyman joined Ipswich in 2011 for £1.1m from Arsenal, scoring nine goals in 75 appearances for the Tractor Boys. He left Ipswich in 2013 in a swap deal with Bristol City. He most recently played with Greenock Morton in the Scottish Championship.

The bottom line: The NCA warns that cannabis smuggling into the UK carries a maximum 14-year prison sentence, contradicting misinformation some couriers receive about facing only fines.

Load next article