Opposition leaders condemn 'deeply damaging' Suffolk election cancellation

Why it matters: The statement came following Suffolk County Council's vote to fast-track devolution plans that will postpone local elections until 2026.

The big picture: While the council leaders supported devolution in principle, they argued:

• Elections shouldn't have been cancelled before devolution details were clear

• Councillors need a current electoral mandate during reorganisation

• Delaying elections damages democratic accountability

• The move creates a "dangerous precedent"

What they're saying: "If devolution is about increasing democracy, it seems bizarre that the first step on that journey would be to cancel an opportunity for residents to make their voice heard," the joint statement read.

• Opposition councillors said they were "ready to face the electorate and be held to account"

• They expressed alarm about a potential "behind closed-door deal between a Labour minister and Conservative council leaders"

Who signed: The statement was backed by council leaders from across Suffolk:

• Deborah Saw - Leader, Babergh District Council (Green)

• Andy Mellen - Leader, Mid Suffolk District Council (Green)

• Caroline Topping - Leader, East Suffolk Council (Green)

• Andrew Stringer - Opposition leader, Suffolk County Council (Green)

• Dave Busby and John Ward - Deputy Leaders, Babergh District Council (Liberal Democrat and Independent)

• Seamus Bennett - County Council and East Suffolk (Liberal Democrat)

The other side: Speaking following the debate, Councillor Matthew Hicks, leader of Suffolk County Council, said: “We need to think what is best for the people and businesses of Suffolk to whom we have a duty to make the difficult decisions – even if that decision means the end of the council or councils on which we sit.

“I want Suffolk to be at the front of the queue, setting the agenda on devolution – not following everyone else when identikit solutions are imposed."

What's next: The government will announce by the end of January which areas have been successful in their devolution priority programme applications. If Suffolk is selected, May's elections will be postponed until 2026.

Bottom line: While there's broad support for devolution across Suffolk's political spectrum, the decision to cancel May's elections has exposed deep divisions between the county's political leaders.