Skip to main contentEnter
Ipswich.co.uk Logomark in a circle

Ipswich's only independent news website

We publish the stories that matter and champion everything that's good about our town – without the ads, popups or tracking

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

We can't do this without you!

If you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for our town, please consider contributing just £24 per year

Suffolk County Council votes to fast track devolution plans and cancel May's local elections

News
Ipswich.co.uk Logomark in a circle

Ipswich's only independent news website

We publish the stories that matter and champion everything that's good about our town – without the ads, popups or tracking

Suffolk County Council has voted to postpone local elections and pursue fast-track devolution that would see the creation of a directly elected mayor for Suffolk and Norfolk. The decision, passed by 43 votes to 15, could lead to the biggest shake-up of local government in the region in 50 years.

Why it matters: The move could result in all six of Suffolk's district councils, including Ipswich Borough Council, being replaced by two large unitary authorities, fundamentally changing how local services are delivered in the region.

The big picture: Under the government's Devolution Priority Programme (DPP), Suffolk and Norfolk would:

  • Share a directly elected mayor

  • See current councils merged into larger authorities

  • Have more local control over funding and powers – although this is fiercely contested by many

  • Postpone May's local elections until 2026

Suffolk County Council sign on a building
Suffolk County Council has voted to postpone local elections and pursue fast-track devolution that would see the creation of a directly elected mayor for Suffolk and NorfolkOliver Rouane-WilliamsIpswich.co.uk

What they're saying:

  • Conservative council leader Matthew Hicks called it "one of the biggest decisions this council will take in its 50 plus-year history" and said it was "better to be engaged and part of the process."

  • Sarah Adams, Labour group leader, supported the decision, noting it aligned with Labour government policy.

  • Andrew Stringer, leader of the opposition Greens, Liberal Democrats and Independents group, who are supportive of devolution but not the cancellation of local election, criticised the plans, saying "It really benefits the Labour Party and Conservative Party here in Suffolk to not have an election in 2025 because they fear that they might not do very well."

The other side: Protesters gathered outside Endeavour House before the meeting, demanding May elections proceed as planned.

Inga Lockington, County Councillor for St Margarets and Westgate (Liberal Democrat), warned: "If we have a mayor for Norfolk and Suffolk they will simply have to tow the line and do what the government wants. It won't be about what we say locally."

Protesters gathered outside Endeavour House
Protesters gathered outside Endeavour House before the meeting, demanding May elections proceed as plannedDavid PlowmanDavid Plowman

Critics warn that a combined Norfolk-Suffolk authority would disadvantage Ipswich, with local businessman and campaigner Mark Ling previously warning that "Norfolk has 150,000 more people than Suffolk, any election will ALWAYS result in a mayor decided by Norfolk's preference, and its will."

Ling also points to previous regional partnerships that "delivered over £1bn in infrastructure upgrades to A11, A47, an almost complete Norwich orbital, and focus on Norwich-Cambridge tech corridor" while "delivering nothing for Ipswich & Felixstowe."

What's next: The government will announce by the end of January which areas have been successful in their DPP applications. If approved, more detailed proposals and consultation would follow and May's local elections would be delayed until 2026. If not selected for the programme, local elections would take place as normal.

Bottom line: There are still many unknowns regarding how devolution will shape up and impact our town and region. While supporters argue the changes will streamline services and bring more powers locally, critics fear it could reduce democratic accountability and local representation.

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

We can't do this without you!

If you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for our town, please consider contributing just £24 per year

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

Ipswich's only free and independent news publication

Support our journalism

We can't do this without you! Unlike the Ipswich Star and East Anglian Daily Times, Ipswich.co.uk has no banner advertising and no wealthy US corporate owners.

So, if you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for a better Ipswich, please consider contributing just £24 per year.

Every penny matters and allows us to keep producing good quality local journalism that respects your time, attention and privacy.

Become a supporter

Police appeal after golf ball attack damages historic Landguard Fort

News
Ipswich.co.uk Logomark in a circle

Ipswich's only independent news website

We publish the stories that matter and champion everything that's good about our town – without the ads, popups or tracking

Over 40 golf balls were driven at Felixstowe's Landguard Fort, causing mortar damage to the historic structure's outer wall.

Why it matters: The damage constitutes an offence under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979, which protects historically significant sites.

Inside the Landguard Fort in Felixstowe
Inside the Landguard Fort in FelixstoweGetty Images

The details: Suffolk Police reported that the incident took place between 17:00 on Monday, 10 March and 09:00 on Tuesday, 11 March.

The golf balls were driven from a grass mound outside the fort on Point View Road, with some projectiles clearing the outer wall and landing in the inner parade area.

What's next: Officers are urging anyone who witnessed the incident or has information about those responsible to come forward.

How to help: Contact Suffolk Police quoting crime reference 37/13803/25 via:

Alternatively, information can be provided anonymously to Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111 or through their online form.

The bottom line: This act of vandalism has caused damage to one of Felixstowe's most important historic landmarks, which is protected by national legislation.

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

We can't do this without you!

If you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for our town, please consider contributing just £24 per year

Load next article