Skip to main contentEnter
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Rail and A12 prioritised over Northern Bypass in transport bid

News
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

Transport East has submitted funding requests for multiple infrastructure projects in Suffolk, but an Ipswich Northern Bypass is a notable absence from its proposals.

Why it matters: The submission comes as campaigners warn that prioritising rail improvements over road infrastructure could cost Suffolk transport companies up to £200 million annually in lost business.

The big picture: Transport East is one of seven Sub-National Transport Bodies in England. The partnership brings together local transport and planning authorities with business leaders, Network Rail and National Highways across Essex, Norfolk, Suffolk, Southend-on-Sea and Thurrock. Its role is to develop transport strategy and provide a unified regional voice in national planning.

The Orwell Bridge in Ipswich
The Orwell Bridge has been left out of funding proposals by Transport EastOliver Rouane-WilliamsIpswich.co.uk

What's being proposed: Transport East are seeking funding for:

  • Rail capacity improvements at Ely and Haughley to support freight routes and increase passenger services

  • A12 upgrades east of Ipswich to support housing and jobs growth

  • More frequent trains between Ipswich and Cambridge/Peterborough

What's not being proposed: They are not seeking funding for an Ipswich Northern Bypass, despite Ipswich MP and Mission Champion for the East of England Jack Abbott leading calls for it to be prioritised by Westminster and recently labelling the cost of failing to act "far too high".

For context: The Ely/Haughley improvements – while positive – would shift an expected 1,000 truck movements per day to rail. Meanwhile, the Orwell Bridge handles around 70,000 daily vehicle movements and is operating at 85% capacity, with planned housing expected to add another 15% traffic.

What they're saying: Mark Ling, a local logistics expert and long-time bypass campaigner, warns: "Suffolk's leaders are pursuing a policy that will take away 1,000 transport jobs per day mainly from Suffolk transport companies and move the work OUT of Suffolk."

Meanwhile, Will Quince, Chair Executive of Transport East, said: "Transport in the East is vital to enable residents and businesses to succeed, and to unlock economic growth in region and the nation."

Transport East said they are "engaging with National Highways who manage the bridge, Suffolk County Council, the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce, and MPs – including Jack Abbott – to understand the challenges and explore both short and long-term solutions."

What's next: The Chancellor is expected to announce funding decisions in late spring of 2025, while a campaign called "Enabling the East: Priority Transport Investment" will continue promoting the outlined schemes.

Jack Abbott was approached but was unavailable for comment.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

Today's supporter

Attwells Solicitors

An award-winning local law firm. Attwells is rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors and holds an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Speak with us

Multiple unitary authorities 'vital' for Suffolk's diverse communities, councils claim

News
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

A joint report from Suffolk's councils argues that the county's mix of rural, coastal, industrial, agricultural and urban areas requires more than one council to effectively serve residents.

Why it matters: The five district and borough councils say a single "mega-council" covering a vast geographical area could not focus on the competing needs of three-quarters of a million people as effectively as multiple unitary authorities.

What's driving the news: Suffolk County Council supports creating a single unitary authority covering the entire county, but this has been unanimously rejected by the five district and borough councils it would replace.

The details: Babergh District Council, East Suffolk Council, Ipswich Borough Council, Mid Suffolk District Council, and West Suffolk Council have each approved the report following a series of meetings where councillors examined and shaped the proposals.

In a joint statement, the council leaders said: "Multiple unitary authorities will produce services designed with residents in mind to meet local needs, drive improved outcomes, create value and save money in a sustainable way."

"Our joint proposal demonstrates that a one-size-fits-all mega authority will not solve the existing issue of large countywide services that will continue to drain money, require improvement, and potentially lead to further cost cutting."

By the numbers: The interim report claims multiple unitary authorities will provide:

  • Cost-effective and high-quality services for Suffolk residents

  • Long-term financial sustainability

  • Economic growth and support to local industry

  • Stronger democratic representation and community engagement

  • Governance systems which can adapt to future growth

  • Structures to support thriving communities and economies

The bigger picture: The councils argue their approach would support "a more balanced solution for the governance of the Mayoral Combined Authority" being set up next year for Norfolk and Suffolk.

What they're saying: "This is a generational change to the way local government and services are delivered and something we should seize," the council leaders stated. "It is a real opportunity to think holistically about how services such as leisure, housing and social care could help residents to thrive."

What's next: The interim report does not constitute a final decision. Councils will have further time to develop options to redesign local government, with community views "at the heart of this work."

The bottom line: "Our collective solution is the best way to deliver great services and value for money. It makes sure the 'local' stays in Local Government for Suffolk," the council leaders concluded.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Load next article