Skip to main contentEnter

DanceEast

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

DanceEast Youth Takeover in 2023

There's something for everyone

Watch a performance, join a term of classes or attend a workshop at DanceEast

Suffolk Chamber's A14 report reveals damning impact on Suffolk businesses as MPs speak out on proposed solutions

News

DanceEast

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

Suffolk faces a potential economic crisis as 83% of businesses say ongoing A14 disruption will force them to cut jobs unless significant improvements are made within the next decade.

Why it matters: The stark warning comes from the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce's latest report, Broken Down, that reveals 87% of local firms have been negatively impacted by A14 disruptions in the past 12 months, with many considering scaling back their Suffolk operations.

The Broken Down report by the Suffolk Chamber of Commerce
The Broken Down report revealed 87% of local firms have been negatively impacted by A14 disruptions in the past 12 monthsOliver Rouane-WilliamsIpswich.co.uk

By the numbers: The Chamber surveyed more than 350 businesses across multiple sectors in November 2024:

  • 51% cited increased costs from disruption

  • 49% reported negative impacts on client retention

  • 32% mentioned staff issues, including childcare costs and retention problems

  • 85% said their investment plans will be impacted without improvements

For context: Businesses stated that the Orwell Bridge area causes the most significant disruption (81%), followed by knock-on delays of the Orwell Bridge (46%) and the Copdock Interchange (39%).

The Chamber's view: "Broken Down makes sobering reading. With no end in sight to the regular delays and closures across parts of this nationally vital road, many business owners and employers clearly feel abandoned by Government and National Highways," Suffolk Chamber's chief executive John Dugmore said.

Speaking at the report's launch, the Chamber stated it was "open to all concepts at this stage," including an Ipswich Northern Bypass, but stopped some way short of definitively backing it.

What's next: The Chamber's report outlines several crucial actions:

Immediately:

  • Funding for Ely and Haughley rail junction upgrades

  • Research into economic costs of A14 delays

  • Automated messaging service for closure alerts

Within 12 months:

  • National Highways traffic officers at major incidents

  • Earlier investment in Copdock Interchange

Within 24 months:

  • A government taskforce to investigate additional capacity as Orwell Bridge nears end of lifespan

James Cartlidge, Jack Abbott, John Dugmore, Paul Simon
James Cartlidge, Jack Abbott, John Dugmore, Paul SimonOliver Rouane-WilliamsIpswich.co.uk

What MPs are saying: Ipswich MP and Mission Champion for the East of England Jack Abbott, who recently wrote to the PM to request that the government prioritise an Ipswich Northern Bypass, was clear in his view that while he was very supportive of all the solutions proposed by the Chamber, only an Ipswich Northern Bypass would suffice in resolving the A14s issues.

When questioned by this publication if he believed it was possible to resolve the challenges highlighted by the report without an Ipswich Northern Bypass, he answered, "No," before labelling the concept of an Orwell Tunnell "bonkers" and an Upper Orwell Crossing "for the birds."

South Suffolk MP James Cartlidge spoke of the need for stakeholders to be open and honest about the costs of a bypass—financial and to our countryside—saying, "The question we're really asking is do we want to urbanise Suffolk?"

Meanwhile, Central Suffolk and North Ipswich MP Patrick Spencer agreed with the principle findings of the report, stating that "we need to think holistically about our transport infrastructure and collectively lobby to upgrade the links that are critical for the future economic health of Ipswich and wider Suffolk" but has publicly spoken out against an Ipswich Northern Bypass and did not attend the briefing.

The bottom line: All local MPs have backed the Chamber's calls for urgent action, but, as is often the case, there is likely to be disagreement amongst key stakeholders on exactly which options represent the best long-term solution, with Ipswich's two MPs already at loggerheads on the Northern Bypass and the Chamber of Commerce remaining "open to all concepts" but falling short of explicitly backing it.

Whatever happens next, to use the words of Ipswich MP Jack Abbott: "The cost of failing to act is far too high."

DanceEast Youth Takeover in 2023

There's something for everyone

Watch a performance, join a term of classes or attend a workshop at DanceEast

The Little Prince at DanceEast in Ipswich

Today's supporter

DanceEast

From watching a performance, to joining a term of classes, to trying a one-off workshop, DanceEast has something for everyone.

Browse what's on

Are organised crime fronts hiding in plain sight on Ipswich high streets?

Feature

DanceEast

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

The National Crime Agency's crackdown on high street businesses suspected of links to organised crime has made headlines in Shrewsbury but remains conspicuously absent in Ipswich, despite remarkably similar retail patterns.

A pattern emerging elsewhere

While Ipswich residents have yet to witness raids on local businesses, a stark scene is unfolding elsewhere: officers forcing their way into brightly-coloured barber shops, vape stores, minimarts, candy stores and phone repair shops that have proliferated across town centres.

Last month, the National Crime Agency (NCA) coordinated 265 raids on such premises across England and Wales as part of Operation Machinize, targeting high street businesses suspected of being fronts for international crime gangs – but it remains unclear if Suffolk, or Ipswich, has been part of this operation.

Organised crime and the impact on Ipswich's high street
Oliver Rouane-WilliamsIpswich.co.uk

Shrewsbury and Ipswich: towns with similar profiles

In Shrewsbury, a market town not dissimilar to Ipswich, officers detained two Kurdish asylum seekers during raids on barber shops, seizing thousands of pounds in cash and illicit vapes. The intelligence suggested these establishments were linked to money laundering, illegal immigration and drug dealing.

The parallels between Shrewsbury and Ipswich are difficult to ignore. Both are historic county towns with traditional market squares, and a mix of independent and chain retailers. Both have experienced the same influx of barber shops, vape stores, minimarts, candy stores and phone repair shops on their high street.

Yet while Shrewsbury has seen decisive action, Ipswich residents have yet to witness any comparable enforcement activity. At least not visibly. And if it has, it has yet to make any difference.

The Ipswich landscape

According to commercial property analysts Green Street, the average number of barbers per person in England and Wales has doubled in the past decade.

Walk through Ipswich town centre and the changing retail landscape is evident – multiple barber shops, vape outlets, phone repair shops and sweet shops often within yards of each other, typically with very few visible customers.

It is important to note that we are not suggesting any specific businesses in Ipswich are engaged in illegal activity. The presence of these shops alone does not indicate wrongdoing, and many could be legitimate businesses.

But questions should be asked. And questions are being asked – repeatedly – by residents.

The scale of the problem

The National Crime Agency estimates that £12 billion in illicit cash is laundered in the UK annually, with lots of it flowing through criminal front organisations on high streets.

These businesses appeared to surge as shop vacancies grew following the pandemic, creating opportunities for criminal gangs to establish themselves in plain sight.

The suspicious signs are easy to spot: businesses claiming implausible income levels, unpaid utility bills despite supposed high turnover, and the sale of illicit products like illegal vapes and tobacco.

In Greater Manchester, linked mini-marts were found to be staffed by asylum seekers, some working illegally, with hidden compartments concealing contraband.

What Operation Machinize uncovered

During Operation Machinize, authorities discovered cannabis farms, seized Class A drugs, arrested 35 people and questioned 55 suspected illegal immigrants. Three potential victims of modern slavery were identified. Bank accounts worth over £1 million were frozen and £40,000 in cash seized.

Detective Inspector Daniel Fenn, who led raids in Shrewsbury as part of the operation, said: "Members of the public are angry. They can see these fronts are there. The criminals feel they are hidden here. They think they can come to sleepy areas and won't be found."

The same could easily be said of Ipswich.

The pattern of exploitation is particularly concerning – the NCA believes some shops are used as fronts for drug-trafficking, people-smuggling, modern slavery and child sexual exploitation. In 2023, it secured the conviction of one Iranian Kurdish barber shop owner who was using his London premises as a base for smuggling 10,000 people to the UK in small boats.

Impact on legitimate businesses

Legitimate barbers are calling for a registration scheme and stricter regulation. Gareth Penn, chief executive of the Hair and Barber Council, highlighted how illegal barbers have led to fungal infections from improperly cleaned equipment.

More importantly, though, is the damage being done to genuine businesses that cannot compete with those avoiding costs and taxes, and those that cannot find suitable high street premises.

The damage is significant and potentially long-lasting.

Will Ipswich be next?

For Ipswich, the question now is whether Operation Machinize will visibly extend to Suffolk – or indeed, whether it already has without public knowledge.

Unlike local police forces, the National Crime Agency is exempt from Freedom of Information requests, making it impossible for journalists or the public to determine how many Ipswich businesses, if any, have been investigated.

This distinction is important.

While local police forces handle everyday law enforcement, the NCA was specifically created to tackle serious and organised crime that extends across police force boundaries, international borders, or requires specialist capabilities.

Their involvement signals that these high street businesses are not merely local issues but part of sophisticated criminal networks operating nationally and internationally.

Security Minister Dan Jarvis has stated that "high street crime undermines our security, our borders, and the confidence of our communities", promising "decisive action" to bring those responsible to justice.

The road ahead

There are concerns about the effectiveness of current measures. Of the 265 raids conducted, only 10 shops have been shut down permanently. Many businesses raided were back operating within minutes of officers leaving.

The challenge for authorities extends beyond individual shops to dismantling the organised crime networks behind them – networks that may have been profiting in plain sight for years on our high streets. While local police forces can target individual businesses, only the NCA has the mandate and resources to tackle the international networks behind them.

For Ipswich residents concerned about these issues, the prospect of action against suspicious businesses cannot come soon enough. However, due to the secretive nature of NCA operations, we may never know the full extent of their activities in our town – only their results, if and when they choose to make them public.

DanceEast Youth Takeover in 2023

There's something for everyone

Watch a performance, join a term of classes or attend a workshop at DanceEast

Load next article