Skip to main contentEnter
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Suffolk school fines soar as 90% linked to term-time holidays

News
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

Parents in Suffolk faced an unprecedented 11,784 fines for unauthorised school absences last academic year – up 19% from the previous year, with nine in 10 penalties issued for term-time holidays.

Why it matters: The sharp rise marks the highest number of penalties issued since records began in 2009-10, quantifying a growing conflict between family holiday affordability and school attendance requirements.

By the numbers:

  • 11,784 penalty notices issued in 2023-24 – a 19% increase from the previous year

  • 91% of fines related to unauthorised family holidays

  • Parents were fined £80 for their first offence – up £60 from the previous year – and £160 for a second offence within three years

The big picture: Suffolk's trend mirrors a national surge, with England recording 487,344 penalty notices – also the highest figure since records began.

A father with his two children at an airport
Parents in Suffolk faced an unprecedented 11,784 fines for unauthorised school absences last academic yearAkabeiGetty Images

What they're saying: "School leaders take no pleasure in parents being fined, but must have clear, consistent policies in place that emphasise the importance of attendance," says Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders.

Between the lines: Education leaders acknowledge the financial pressures driving term-time holidays:

  • They understand parents' struggle with peak holiday costs

  • But warn missing school damages education

  • Call for government intervention with travel firms

  • Describe current fines as a "blunt tool"

The other side: Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson emphasises that "behaviour like term-time holidays cannot be changed with support alone — which is why fines have a vital place in our system."

By the numbers: Of Suffolk's resolved cases:

  • 9,194 fines were paid

  • 1,435 were withdrawn

  • 134 led to a prosecution

The bottom line: While school leaders recognise the financial challenges families face with holiday costs, the record-breaking surge in fines underscores the growing conflict between attendance policies and affordable family travel.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

Today's supporter

Attwells Solicitors

An award-winning local law firm. Attwells is rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors and holds an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Speak with us

Multiple unitary authorities 'vital' for Suffolk's diverse communities, councils claim

News
Attwells logo

Attwells Solicitors

Proud supporters of free and independent local journalism in Ipswich

A joint report from Suffolk's councils argues that the county's mix of rural, coastal, industrial, agricultural and urban areas requires more than one council to effectively serve residents.

Why it matters: The five district and borough councils say a single "mega-council" covering a vast geographical area could not focus on the competing needs of three-quarters of a million people as effectively as multiple unitary authorities.

What's driving the news: Suffolk County Council supports creating a single unitary authority covering the entire county, but this has been unanimously rejected by the five district and borough councils it would replace.

The details: Babergh District Council, East Suffolk Council, Ipswich Borough Council, Mid Suffolk District Council, and West Suffolk Council have each approved the report following a series of meetings where councillors examined and shaped the proposals.

In a joint statement, the council leaders said: "Multiple unitary authorities will produce services designed with residents in mind to meet local needs, drive improved outcomes, create value and save money in a sustainable way."

"Our joint proposal demonstrates that a one-size-fits-all mega authority will not solve the existing issue of large countywide services that will continue to drain money, require improvement, and potentially lead to further cost cutting."

By the numbers: The interim report claims multiple unitary authorities will provide:

  • Cost-effective and high-quality services for Suffolk residents

  • Long-term financial sustainability

  • Economic growth and support to local industry

  • Stronger democratic representation and community engagement

  • Governance systems which can adapt to future growth

  • Structures to support thriving communities and economies

The bigger picture: The councils argue their approach would support "a more balanced solution for the governance of the Mayoral Combined Authority" being set up next year for Norfolk and Suffolk.

What they're saying: "This is a generational change to the way local government and services are delivered and something we should seize," the council leaders stated. "It is a real opportunity to think holistically about how services such as leisure, housing and social care could help residents to thrive."

What's next: The interim report does not constitute a final decision. Councils will have further time to develop options to redesign local government, with community views "at the heart of this work."

The bottom line: "Our collective solution is the best way to deliver great services and value for money. It makes sure the 'local' stays in Local Government for Suffolk," the council leaders concluded.

Attwells staff outside their Ipswich office

An award-winning local law firm

Rated as "Excellent" on Review Solicitors with an impressive 4.8/5 on Feefo.

Load next article