Skip to main contentEnter
Ipswich.co.uk Logomark in a circle

Ipswich's only independent news website

We publish the stories that matter and champion everything that's good about our town – without the ads, popups or tracking

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

We can't do this without you!

If you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for our town, please consider contributing just £24 per year

One in seven with severe mental illness miss crucial health checks in Ipswich

News
Ipswich.co.uk Logomark in a circle

Ipswich's only independent news website

We publish the stories that matter and champion everything that's good about our town – without the ads, popups or tracking

New figures show 14% of people with severe mental illnesses in Ipswich and East Suffolk don't receive all their required annual health checks.

The big picture: The NHS aims to provide comprehensive annual health checks for people with severe mental illnesses, but is falling short of its targets in some areas.

Why it matters: Andy Bell, chief executive at the Centre for Mental Health, explains: "Tragically, people with severe mental illness have a 15-20 year shorter life expectancy than the general population. This is unacceptable, but it's not inevitable."

By the numbers:

  • 2,147 out of 2,483 patients (86%) on the severe mental illness register in the former NHS Ipswich and East Suffolk CCG area received all required check-ups in the year to March

  • This is up from 75% the year before

  • Across England, 361,210 patients (68% of those registered) received all physical health checks

  • The NHS target was 390,000 people for 2023-24, which was missed

Key details: The annual health checks include:

  • Blood and urine tests

  • Alcohol, smoking, and body mass index assessments

  • Discussion of medication and vaccination status

  • Addressing other physical health issues

Zooming in: In the former NHS Ipswich and East Suffolk CCG area:

  • The most common check was for smoking assessment (96% of people)

  • The least-attended was the blood lipid check (91%)

Between the lines: Stuti Bagri, researcher at the Nuffield Trust, points out: "These checks are the first step in the right direction but hold little value if deployed alone. What happens next is crucial. If checks aren't followed up by meaningful advice or intervention (which are not currently recorded), it's difficult to know what the real impact is."

What they're saying: An NHS England spokesperson stated: "NHS staff are working incredibly hard to deliver more physical health checks and follow-up interventions for people with severe mental illness than ever before, with a record 360,000 people receiving checks last year."

What's next: The NHS is asking local systems to fund outreach programmes to increase uptake of these checks and ensure policies are in place for patients requiring intensive treatment for severe mental illness.

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

We can't do this without you!

If you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for our town, please consider contributing just £24 per year

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

Ipswich's only free and independent news publication

Support our journalism

We can't do this without you! Unlike the Ipswich Star and East Anglian Daily Times, Ipswich.co.uk has no banner advertising and no wealthy US corporate owners.

So, if you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for a better Ipswich, please consider contributing just £24 per year.

Every penny matters and allows us to keep producing good quality local journalism that respects your time, attention and privacy.

Become a supporter

Multiple unitary authorities 'vital' for Suffolk's diverse communities, councils claim

News
Ipswich.co.uk Logomark in a circle

Ipswich's only independent news website

We publish the stories that matter and champion everything that's good about our town – without the ads, popups or tracking

A joint report from Suffolk's councils argues that the county's mix of rural, coastal, industrial, agricultural and urban areas requires more than one council to effectively serve residents.

Why it matters: The five district and borough councils say a single "mega-council" covering a vast geographical area could not focus on the competing needs of three-quarters of a million people as effectively as multiple unitary authorities.

What's driving the news: Suffolk County Council supports creating a single unitary authority covering the entire county, but this has been unanimously rejected by the five district and borough councils it would replace.

The details: Babergh District Council, East Suffolk Council, Ipswich Borough Council, Mid Suffolk District Council, and West Suffolk Council have each approved the report following a series of meetings where councillors examined and shaped the proposals.

In a joint statement, the council leaders said: "Multiple unitary authorities will produce services designed with residents in mind to meet local needs, drive improved outcomes, create value and save money in a sustainable way."

"Our joint proposal demonstrates that a one-size-fits-all mega authority will not solve the existing issue of large countywide services that will continue to drain money, require improvement, and potentially lead to further cost cutting."

By the numbers: The interim report claims multiple unitary authorities will provide:

  • Cost-effective and high-quality services for Suffolk residents

  • Long-term financial sustainability

  • Economic growth and support to local industry

  • Stronger democratic representation and community engagement

  • Governance systems which can adapt to future growth

  • Structures to support thriving communities and economies

The bigger picture: The councils argue their approach would support "a more balanced solution for the governance of the Mayoral Combined Authority" being set up next year for Norfolk and Suffolk.

What they're saying: "This is a generational change to the way local government and services are delivered and something we should seize," the council leaders stated. "It is a real opportunity to think holistically about how services such as leisure, housing and social care could help residents to thrive."

What's next: The interim report does not constitute a final decision. Councils will have further time to develop options to redesign local government, with community views "at the heart of this work."

The bottom line: "Our collective solution is the best way to deliver great services and value for money. It makes sure the 'local' stays in Local Government for Suffolk," the council leaders concluded.

Oliver Rouane-Williams speaking with an elderly couple in the town centre

We can't do this without you!

If you value strong, free, independent local media that fights tirelessly for our town, please consider contributing just £24 per year

Load next article